Review article| Volume 141, ISSUE 5, P292-296, May 2003

Research ethics committees in developing countries and informed consent: with special reference to Turkey

  • N.Yasemin Oguz
    Reprint requests: N. Yasemin Oguz, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Ethics, Dekanlik Kampusu Sihhiye-06100, Ankara, Turkey
    Department of Medical Ethics, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
    Search for articles by this author


      Research ethics committees (RECs) are the institutional equivalent of institutional review boards (IRBs) with respect to their role in the ethical analysis of research projects. In Turkey, as in most developing countries, these committees were initiated as a result of pressure from the Western scientific community. Since their formation, RECs have faced problems because of an underdeveloped scientific culture and the absence of established ethical standards. On the one hand, the standards of the RECs and IRBs in the developed world seemed too hard to achieve; on the other, some of the international regulatory rules, such as respect for autonomy, are not culturally sensitive. In addition to problems facing RECs, researchers have had difficulties in fulfilling RECs’ requisites. Respect for autonomy is a good example for Turkey. The social construct of Turkish society is not based on the Western concept of autonomy; it is based on “collective autonomy,” which is completely different from the Western definition. Cultural interpretation of concepts is the perception of concepts effected by their cultural connections with other concepts. For example, “motherhood” as a concept has many cultural connections, so when it is used we have to consider those culturally determined contexts. In some countries, the familiar concept and term are kept separated from the one that is imported. In others, the imported concept alters the original concepts content. Although its course varies in different countries, it always puts extraordinary pressure on RECs and researchers in their relationship between themselves and other parties with conflicting interests. In this article, some of the main concerns of RECs in developing countries are discussed, with special reference to Turkey. The universality of regulatory norms is questioned and the importance of culturally sensitive and effective safeguards emphasized.


      CREC (central research ethics committee), IRB (institutional review board), LREC (local research ethics committee), REC (research ethics committee)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Translational Research
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Karakaya H.
        • Oguz N.Y.
        Research ethics committees in Turkey.
        Ankara Tip Mecmuasi. 1993; 46 ([in Turkish]): 321-326
        • Arda B.
        • Aksit B.
        • Calisir H.C.
        • Platin N.
        • Cay-Senler F.
        • Atasoy T.
        • et al.
        How adequate is the REC?.
        in: Arda B. Research on medical ethics. 1st ed. Turkish Association of Bioethics, Ankara, Turkey1999: 1-12 ([in Turkish])
      1. Turkish Ministry of Health. The statute on drug research. 1993 [in Turkish]

        • Akpinar C.
        • Asian F.
        • Ornek-Buken N.
        • Calikoglu E.
        • Cay F.
        • Oguz N.Y.
        • et al.
        A survey on local research ethics committees in Ankara.
        in: Arda B. Research on medical ethics. 1st ed. Turkish Association of Bioethics, Ankara, Turkey1999: 13-18 ([in Turkish])
        • Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine
        Guidelines for research ethics committees. Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey1992 ([in Turkish])
      2. Faculty of Medicine. Guidelines for ethics committees. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara University, 1993 [in Turkish]

        • Oguz N.Y.
        Bioethics Examiner. 2002; 6: 1-9
        • Oguz N.Y.
        • Arda B.
        Medical ethics interest grows in Turkey.
        Bull Med Ethics. 1991; 73: 13-17
        • Beauchamp T.L.
        • Childress J.F.
        Principles of biomedical ethics. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, New York, NY1994
      3. Ersoy, N., Ethical problems about informing patients and obtaining their informed consent on surgical treatment. Istanbul, Turkey: Istanbul University Institute of Health Sciences, 1991[in Turkish; doctoral thesis]

        • Faden R.R.
        • Beauchamp T.L.
        A history and theory of informed consent. 1st ed. Oxford University Press, New York, NY1986
        • Oguz N.Y.
        Physician-patient relationship in clinical practice.
        Turkiye Klinikleri Tibbi Etik Dergisi. 1995; 3 ([in Turkish]): 59-65
      4. Faculty of Medicine. Guidelines for scientific committees. Gulhane Military Academy, Ankara, Turkey, 1986 [in Turkish]

      5. Oguz, N.Y., Consent and informed consent in psychiatry: perspectives from ethics, law, and science. Ankara, Turkey: University Institute of Health Sciences, 1994 [in Turkish; doctoral thesis]

        • Ersoy N.
        • Altun I.
        • Beser A.
        The role of nurses to undertake the role of patient advocate.
        Eubios J Asian Int Bioethics. 1997; 7: 167-169
        • Oguz N.Y.
        Developments in patients’ rights and changing values.
        Turkiye Klinikleri Tibbi Etik Dergisi. 1997; 5 ([in Turkish]): 50-55
        • Wang V.
        • Marsh F.
        Ethical principles and cultural integrity in health care delivery.
        J Genet Counseling. 1992; 1: 81-92
        • Gordon E.J.
        • Daugherty C.K.
        Referral and decision-making among advanced cancer patients participating in phase I trials at a single institution.
        J Clin Ethics. 2001; 12: 31-38
      6. Guvenc, B., Turkish culture [in Turkish]. 1st ed. Istanbul, Turkey: Remzi Publishing, 1995

      7. Oguz, N.Y., The roles of physician and patient in medical practice. In: Arda, B., Oguz, N.Y., Sahinoglu-Pelin, S. Deontology. 2nd ed. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, 1999:27–41 [in Turkish]

        • Davis T.C.
        • Holcombe R.I.
        • Berkel H.J.
        • Pramanik S.
        • Divers S.G.
        Informed consent for clinical trials.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998; 90: 668-674
        • Kasturiaratchi N.D.
        Addressing vulnerabilities in developing countries.
        Developing World Bioethics. 2001; 1: 148-152
        • Seafight H.R.
        • Miller C.K.
        Remembering and interpreting informed consent.
        J Am Board Fam Pract. 1996; 9: 14-22
      8. The ethics of clinical research in developing countries. London, England: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 1999

        • Ruiz-Canela M.
        • de Imla-Estevez J.
        • Martinez-Gonzales M.A.
        • Gomez-Garcia E.
        • Femandez-Crehuet J.
        Methodological quality and reporting of ethical requirements in clinical trials.
        J Med Ethics. 2001; 27: 172-176