Advertisement
Original article| Volume 132, ISSUE 1, P73-75, July 1998

Detection of anti-hepatitis C virus antibodies in patients undergoing dialysis by utilizing a hepatitis C virus 3.0 assay: Correlation with hepatitis C virus RNA

  • M. De Medina
    Affiliations
    Division of Hepatology and Nephrology, University of Miami School of Medicine, and the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Miami, Florida, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • M. Hill
    Affiliations
    Division of Hepatology and Nephrology, University of Miami School of Medicine, and the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Miami, Florida, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • H.O. Sullivan
    Affiliations
    Division of Hepatology and Nephrology, University of Miami School of Medicine, and the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Miami, Florida, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • B. Leclerq
    Affiliations
    Division of Hepatology and Nephrology, University of Miami School of Medicine, and the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Miami, Florida, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • J.R Pennell
    Affiliations
    Division of Hepatology and Nephrology, University of Miami School of Medicine, and the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Miami, Florida, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • L. Jeffers
    Affiliations
    Division of Hepatology and Nephrology, University of Miami School of Medicine, and the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Miami, Florida, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • K.R. Reddy
    Affiliations
    Division of Hepatology and Nephrology, University of Miami School of Medicine, and the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Miami, Florida, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • E.R. Schiff
    Affiliations
    Division of Hepatology and Nephrology, University of Miami School of Medicine, and the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Miami, Florida, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • G.O. Perez
    Correspondence
    Reprint requests: Guido O. Perez, MD, Chief, Dialysis Unit (111-C), Veterans Administration Medical Center, Room a-1005, 1201 N.W. 16th St., Miami, FL 33125.
    Affiliations
    Division of Hepatology and Nephrology, University of Miami School of Medicine, and the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Miami, Florida, USA
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is endemic in long-term dialysis units. We assessed the performance of a recently developed HCV 3.0 assay for the detection of HCV antibodies in patients undergoing dialysis. The study evaluated 128 patients undergoing long-term maintenance hemodialysis. Anti-HCV was detected by 2.0 and 3.0 enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Results were confirmed with recombinant immunoblot assays (RIBA™ 2.0 and RIBA™ 3.0). HCV RNA was detected by using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Thirty-two patients (25%) were HCV EIA 2.0 positive. Of these, 1 was RIBA™ 2.0 negative (PCR positive), 3 were indeterminate (3 PCR positive), and 28 were positive (23 PCR positive). Thirty-five (27%) were HCV EIA 3.0 positive. One was RIBA™ 3.0 negative (PCR positive), 1 was indeterminate (c33c, PCR positive), and 33 were positive (27 PCR positive) by RIBA™ 3.0. Thus only 1 PCR-positive patient was negative with RIBA™ 2.0 and 3.0 assays. Two of the 3 RIBA™ 2.0 indeterminate samples were positive with RIBA™ 3.0. One remained indeterminate but was HCV RNA positive. In summary, HCV 3.0 EIA detected 4 additional viremic patients but was positive in 6 PCR-negative subjects. A high correlation of the presence of antibody to c33c with HCV RNA (28 of 34,82%) was found, and it was found in all anti-HCV positive samples and in 1 indeterminate sample. We conclude that the HCV EIA 3.0 test with the supplemental confirmatory RIBA™ 3.0 test may improve the sensitivity for the detection of antiHCV. Nevertheless, in potentially immunocompromised patients undergoing dialysis, PCR continues to be the only reliable test for detecting viremia.

      Abbreviations:

      EIA (enzyme immunoassay), HCV (hepatitis C virus), RIBA™ (recombinant immunoblot assay), RT-PCR (reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction), SIA (strip immunoblot assay)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Translational Research
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Alter HJ
        New kit on the block: evaluation of second-generation assays for detection of antibody to hepatitis C virus.
        Hepatology. 1992; 15: 350-353
        • Vanderpeol CL
        • Cuypers HTM
        • Reesink HW
        • Weiner AJ
        • Quan S
        • Dinello R
        • et al.
        Confirmation of hepatitis C virus infection by new four-antigen recombinant immunoblot assay.
        Lancet. 1991; 337: 317-319
        • Evans CS
        • Tobler L
        • Polito A
        • Stewart J
        • Chien D
        • Wilber J
        • et al.
        Comparative evaluation of supplemental hepatitis C virus antibody test systems.
        Transfusion. 1991; 32: 408-414
        • Nordenfelt E
        • Lofgren B
        • Widell A
        • Hansson BG
        • Zhang YY
        • Hagstam KG
        • et al.
        Hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis patients in Southern Sweden: epidemiological, clinical and diagnostic aspects.
        J Med Virol. 1993; 40: 266-270
        • Pawlotsky JM
        • Fleury A
        • Deforges L
        • Choukroun V
        • Aumont P
        • Duval J
        • et al.
        Highly positive c22-3 “indeterminate” second generation RIBA: resolution by third generation RIBA™ and HCV RNA PCR.
        Hepatology. 1993; 18 ([abstract]): 86A
        • Pereira BJG
        • Milford EL
        • Kirkman RL
        • Quan S
        • Sayre KR
        • Johnson PJ
        • et al.
        Prevalence of hepatitis C virus RNA in organ donor positive for hepatitis C antibody and in the recipients on their organs.
        N Engl J Med. 1992; 327: 910-915
        • Lau JYN
        • Davis GL
        • Brunson ME
        • Qian KP
        • Lin HJ
        • Quan HJ
        • et al.
        Hepatitis C virus infection in kidney transplant recipients.
        Hepatology. 1993; 18: 1027-1031
        • de Medina M
        • Ortiz C
        • Krenc C
        • Leete J
        • Vallari D
        • Hill M
        • et al.
        Improved detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus in dialysis patients using a second-generation enzyme immunoassay.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 1992; 20: 589-591
        • Barrera JM
        • Francis B
        • Ercilla G
        • Nelles M
        • Achord D
        • Darner J
        • et al.
        Improved detection of anti-HCV in post transfusion hepatitis by a third-generation ELISA.
        Vox Sang. 1995; 68: 15-18
        • Courouce AM
        • Bouchardeau F
        • Chauveau P
        • Le Marrec N
        • Girault A
        • Zins B
        • et al.
        Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in haemodialysed patients: HCV-RNA and anti-HCV antibodies (third generation assay).
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1995; 10: 234-239
        • Dentico P
        • Volpe A
        • Buongiorno R
        • Manno C
        • Carabellese S
        • Monno L
        • et al.
        HCV third generation test in hemodialysis patients.
        Ital J Gastroenterol. 1995; 27: 300-302
        • Al Meshari K
        • Al Ahdal M
        • Alfurarh O
        • Ali A
        • Devol E
        • Kessie G
        New insights into hepatitis C virus infection of hemodialysis patients: the implications.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 1995; 25: 572-578